Endodontic ozone therapy

ABSTRACT

A method for treating root canals includes directing an oxidizing gas onto an open root canal through a needle, maintain a presence of the oxidizing gas onto the root canal for a period of time sufficient to kill microorganisms therein, and preventing escape of the oxidizing gas from the root canal. Apparatus for a treatment of root canals includes a source of oxidizing gas, a handpiece, a needle extending from said handpiece and receivable in a tooth root canal. The needle includes an oxidizing gas delivery lumen therethrough, and a cup is attached to the handpiece and surrounding the needle.

The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/087,452 filed Mar. 23, 2005, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/097,758 filed Mar. 13, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,875,018 claiming priority of U.S. Ser. No. 60/279,360 filed Mar. 28, 2001. All of these applications/patent are to be incorporated herein in this entirety including all specifications and drawings.

This invention relates to the use of ozone in the treatment of dental and oral conditions.

In order to treat a tooth that has diseased pulp material therein, it is necessary to remove the diseased pulp material from the pulp cavity, or root canal to prevent bacterial proliferation within the pulp canal of the tooth.

Subsequent to removal of diseased pulp material, the root canal is typically filled with an inert material before sealing off with an aseptic material to prevent continued or future infection of the tooth root.

It is apparent that during root canal therapy the entire root canal including the root tip, be cleaned and filled to eliminate all diseased material.

Typically, this includes opening the tooth to the pulp chamber and then manually cleaning the root canal with appropriate instruments.

Access to the pulp chamber is accomplished by drilling a hole through the tooth, which is subsequently widened for the use of endodontic instruments to large and clean the root canal to remove all the diseased pulp tissue.

Following removal, the root canal must be disinfected and dried prior to filling. A number of endodontic irrigating instruments are utilized and typically purge the root canal with a hydrogen peroxide solution or a sodium hypochloride solution.

Care in this procedure must be taken in order that the irrigating syringe is not inserted too deeply into the root canal or the pressure of the irrigating solutions to prevent flow into the apical dental formen and into the periapical area.

A further disadvantage of such irrigation is that a saliva remover must be inserted into or hanging from the mouth to extract the used irrigating solutions. This, in turn, may give discomfort to the patient and interfere with the dentist's work.

The present invention provides for disinfecting root canals through the use of ozone. Such treatment is preferred following pulp removal.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method in accordance with the present invention for treating root canals includes directing an oxygen gas onto an open root canal through a needle, maintaining a pressure of the oxidizing gas into the root canal for a period of time sufficient to kill micro organisms therein, and preventing escape from the oxidizing gas from the root canal.

In addition, a method in accordance with the present invention may include flushing the oxidizing gas from the root canal with a reductant.

Apparatus for the hereinabove treatment of root canals generally includes a source of oxidizing gas, a handpiece, a needle extending from the handpiece and receivable in a tooth root canal with the needle including an oxidizing gas delivering a lumen therethrough. A cup is provided and attached to the handpiece which surrounds the needle. Preferably, the oxidizing gas comprises ozone. In order facilitate entry of the needle into the root canal, the needle may be flexible.

Preferably, the cup includes a resilient edge engageable with a cusp area of the tooth and the source of oxidizing gas includes an ozone pump.

The apparatus may further include an aspiration pump and an aspiration line connected to the handpiece for circulating the gas through the needle lumen and out of a cup chamber subtending a cup edge.

The apparatus in accordance with the present invention may further include an ozone and aspiration pump controller to circulate the gas through the needle lumen and out of the cup chamber any pressure insufficient to escape past a sealed engagement between the cup and the tooth.

The apparatus may further include a source of reductant interconnected with the handpiece in order to flush the gas from the cup. In addition, the waste reductant accumulator may be provided to connect to the aspiration line along with a residual oxidizing gas aspiration line filter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The advantages and features of the present invention will be better understood by the following description when considered in conjunction of the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of apparatus for treatment of root canals in accordance with the present invention, the apparatus generally including a source of oxidizing gas, an aspiration pump, a source of reductant, a reductant pump and a controller for providing the oxidizing gas to a handpiece;

FIG. 2 illustrated an embodiment of handpiece in accordance with the present invention for delivering a gas to a tooth and generally showing a cup attached to the handpiece for receiving the gas;

FIG. 3 illustrated the handpiece with an alternative cup embodiment, the alternative embodiment cup having an arcuate shape for facilitating application of oxidizing gas to a tooth;

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing application of oxidizing gas to a tooth between a cusp and a gingival utilizing the handpiece and cup shown in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is cross-sectional view of the cup shown in FIG. 2 that is suitable for use in the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a cross sectional view an alternative embodiment of a cup for exposing a selected area of a tooth oxidizing gas;

FIG. 7 is a cross sectional diagram showing an alternative embodiment of a cup in accordance with the present invention for exposing adjacent teeth to oxidizing gas;

FIG. 8 illustrates the use of the cup shown in FIG. 7 as it may be applied to adjacent teeth;

FIG. 9 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the present invention showing a handpiece with a needle for injecting an oxidizing gas into a root canal through an oxidizing gas delivery lumen therethrough along with a surrounding cup;

FIG. 10 is a cross sectional view of the handpiece shown in FIG. 9 with the needle entering a root canal of a tooth; and

FIG. 11 is a view similar to FIG. 10 with the cup engaging a crown/cusp of a tooth to prevent escape of the oxidizing gas and to enable subsequent evacuation thereof.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

With reference to FIGS. 1-4, there is shown apparatus 10 in accordance with the present invention for the treatment of root canals and dental caries which includes a source 12 of oxidizing gas, preferably ozone, and a handpiece 16 (see FIG. 2) for delivering the gas to a tooth, not shown in FIGS. 1-3. The effectiveness of an oxidizing gas such as ozone is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,508 entitled “Use Of Ozone For The Preparation Of Medicaments For The Treatment of Dental Caries” by Edward Lynch. This patent is incorporated herewith in its entirety including all specification and drawings by this specific reference thereto.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, the ozone source 12 includes an ozone generator 20 and an ozone pump 22 for supplying ozone through a line 24, a connector 28 and lines 30 to the handpiece 16. As used herein, the term “ozone” is intended to embrace any suitable oxidizing gas, pure ozone, ionized air and other ozone gaseous mixtures.

As noted in the referenced international patent application, ozone is delivered at a pressure, concentration and for a period of time sufficient to penetrate the carious tissue and kill substantial all of the microorganism within a carious lesion. Specific examples of the use of ozone are set forth in the referenced patent application and are incorporated herewith by the specific reference thereto.

As shown in FIG. 2-3, cups 34 36 attached to the handpiece 16 are provided for receiving the gas and exposing a selected area 38 on a tooth 40, see FIG. 3. The cup 34 may be attached to the handpiece 16 in any conventional manner and include a resilient edge, or sidewall, 44 for sealable engaging the tooth 40 to prevent the escape of gas therepast.

Many different sized and shaped cups may be utilized, as for example shown in FIG. 3 the cup 36 includes an arcuate trunk 50 to facilitate the placement of the cup 36 over the selected area 38 as shown in FIG. 4. The cups 34, 36 may have relatively uniform perimeters 52, 54 for sealably engaging the tooth 40 between a cusp 58 and a gingiva 60 as shown in FIG. 4.

A further cup embodiment 64 is shown in cross-section in FIG. 6 includes a tapered sidewall 66 that may be used for application of oxidizing gas to a smaller selected area (not shown) on the tooth 40.

While a resilient edge or sidewall may be used to couple the cup to the selected area 38 on the tooth 40, it should be appreciated that a separate sealant 68 (See FIG. 6) may be utilized for providing a sealable engagement between the cup 64 and the tooth 40. In this instance, the sidewall 66 need not be resilient.

Another embodiment of a cup 70 is shown in cross-section in FIG. 7 which includes walls 72 which are contoured for enabling the sealable engagement with adjacent teeth 74, 76 as shown in FIG. 8. As shown in FIG. 8, a cup edge 80 has a perimeter contour 82 for providing a sealable engagement with cups 86, 88 of adjacent teeth 74, 76.

All of the cups 34, 64, 70, cross-sectionally illustrated in FIGS. 5-7. include cup chambers 92, 94, 96 that subtend cup edges 98, 100, 102. As shown each of the cups 34, 64, 70 include walls 44, 66, 72 that define the chambers 92, 94, 96 and include first perimeters 106, 108, 110 for sealably coupling the walls 44,66, 72 to the handpiece 16. Second perimeters 112, 114, 116 provide for coupling the walls 44,66 72 to the tooth 40 and exposing the selected areas 38 to gas circulated in the chambers 92, 94, 96.

As shown in FIG. 6, the embodiment 64 the first perimeter 108 may be larger than the second perimeter 115 or, as shown in FIG. 7, the first perimeter 110 may be smaller than the second perimeter 116. Accordingly this variation in cup 64, 70 design enables the application of oxidizing gas the any number of tooth contours and to the application of oxidizing gas to a plurality of teeth has hereinabove described.

As shown in FIGS. 9-11, there is shown a handpiece 11 having a needle 13 extending therefrom and sized for being receivable in a root canal 15 of a tooth 19 with the needle 13 having an oxidizing gas delivery lumen 23 therethrough. A cup 27 attached to the handpiece 11 surrounds the needle 13 forms a chamber 31. The needle may be flexible such as, for example, set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,064.

Following the removal of diseased pulp, the oxidizing gas is directed into the root canal 15 through the needle 13. The presence of oxidizing gas in the root canal is provided for a period of time sufficient to kill the microorganisms therein. The cup 27 prevents escape of the oxidizing gas from the root canal 15. A seal 35 may be provided to seal across a tooth crown 27. A single line 39 connected to the needle lumen 33 may be provided for both introducing ozone and reductant to the root canal 15, or alternating a separate aspiration line 41 may be provided.

In addition, as hereinafter discussed in greater detail, the oxidizing gas may be flushed from the root canal 15 with a reductant.

With reference again to FIG. 1, the apparatus 12 includes an aspiration pump 120 and lines 30, 122, 124 connected to the handpiece 16 for enabling circulation of the ozone into and out of the cup chambers 92, 94, 96, or alternatively through the lumen 23 and out of the cup chamber 31 (FIGS. 9-11).

A controller 126, which may be of any conventional circuit design, is provided for regulating the ozone and aspiration pumps 22, 120 in order to circulate the gas into and out of the cup chambers 92, 94, 96 at a pressure insufficient to permit escape of the gas past a sealed engagement between the cup 31 and teeth 40, 86, 88.

The gas may be circulated through the lumen 23 and out of the cup chamber 31 at a pressure insufficient to permit escape of the gas past a needed engagement between the cup 27 and the tooth 19. Control of the gas flows may also be effected through valves 127, 127 regulated by the controller 126.

Additionally, the apparatus 10 may include a reductant source 128, which is in fluid communication with the cup chambers 31, 92, 94, 96 through lines 30, 130 and a parastalic pump 131. The reductant, which may be a solution of thiocyanate or peppermint, is utilized to flush the cup chambers 31, 92, 94, 96 of oxidizing gas. The oxidizing gas is flushed into the aspiration line 122 following ozone treatment of the tooth 19, 40, 86, 88. The reductant is then aspirated through line 122 and into a waste accumulator 132.

Any residual ozone is then aspirated from the accumulator 132 through the line 124 and into a canister 134 through line 136 for final elimination of the ozone. Thus, the apparatus 12 provides for a totally closed system for the application and removal of ozone to and from teeth 19, 40, 86, 88.

It should also be appreciate that when the cups 34, 36, 64 are utilized between teeth 40, 138 (not shown in FIG. 4) a separate dam 140 maybe utilized as necessary to enable the cups 34, 36, 64 (not shown in FIG. 4) to sealably enclose a selected area for treatment between the teeth 40, 138.

EXAMPLE 1

Many studies concerning the clinical evaluation of ozone have been based on assessments of its harmful effects rather than demonstrating any therapeutic benefits it may offer. Ozone is one of nature's most powerful oxidants which accounts for its ability to kill bacteria, spores and viruses. Uniquely, ozone decomposes to a harmless, non-toxic and environmentally safe material (oxygen). In this investigation, a multicomponent evaluation of the oxidative consumption of salivary biomolecules by ozone (O₃) has been performed using high resolution proton (¹H) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The ozone-generating equipment employed in this study was designed by Purezone Ltd. (Ipswich, U.K.). Unstimulated human saliva samples were collected from 8 patients and each of them was divided into two equivalent portions (0.60 ml). The first of these was treated with O₃ generated from the above device for a period of 30 seconds; the second group of portions served as controls. Samples were subjected to ¹H NMR analysis at an operating frequency of 600 MHz. Results acquired revealed that O₃ treatment gave rise to (1) the oxidative decarboxylation of the salivary electron-donor pyruvate (generating acetate and CO₂, as products), (2) oxidation of the volatile sulphur compound precursor methionine to its corresponding sulphoxide and (3) the oxidative consumption of salivary polyunsaturated fatty acids. Moreover, evidence for the O₃-mediated oxidation of salivary 3-D-hydroxybutyrate was also obtained. High field ¹H NMR spectroscopy provides much useful analytical data regarding the fate of O₃ in human saliva, information which is of much relevance to its potential therapeutic actions in vivo.

EXAMPLE 2

Ozone Effect on Microflora from Primary Root Caries Ex-Vivo

Primary root carious lesions (PRCL) are a major clinical problem. The aim of this study was to establish if ozone could achieve effective microbial killing in PRCL. An ozone producing generator (Purezone Ltd., Ipswich, U.K.) was used in this ex-vivo study assessing the use of ozone on PRCL. In this study, soft PRCL requiring restoration were used as these are the most severe type of lesion found in humans. 20 freshly extracted teeth with PRCL requiring restoration were used. After plaque removal using a hand held standard fine nylon fiber sterile toothbrush with sterile water as a lubricant to cleanse the surface, each tooth was then isolated using sterile cotton wool rolls and dried using a dry sterile cotton wool roll. A sample of PRCL was taken using a sterile excavator from half of the most active part of the lesion. Subsequently, 10 seconds of the ozonized water was applied to the lesion and another sample was taken from the other half of the most active part of the lesion. Each sample was weighed and immediately placed in 1 ml of Fastidious Anaerobe Broth (FAB). To each 1 ml of FAB containing a biopsy o carious or ozone treated carious dentine, sterile glass beads were added. They were vortexed for 30 seconds to facilitate the extraction of any micro-organisms from the carious dentine and disperse any aggregates. After decimal dilution with FAB, 100 ml aliquots of these was spread on Fastidious Anaerobe Agar (LabM, Bury, Lancs., U.K.) supplemented with 5% (v/V) horse blood in an anaerobic chamber at 37° C. for four days. The mean±SE number of each colony type was counted and calculated. Before Ozone After 10 Seconds Treatment of Ozone Treatment Mean ± SE of 5.9 ± 0.15 3.57 ± 0.37 Total cfu (Log₁₀)

Using the paired Student t-test a significant difference (p<0.001) was observed between the two groups. Clearly, the percentage of micro-organisms killed associated with the use of ozone was more than 99%.

EXAMPLE 3

Ozone Effect on Microflora from Primary Root Caries Ex-Vivo

The procedure of Example 2 was repeated except that ozonized water was applied to the lesion for 20 seconds. Using the paired student t-test, a significant difference was observed in the ozonized water group (log₁₀ 3.77±0.42, mean±SE) compared with the control group (log₁₀ 6.18±0.21) (p<0.001).

The results of these tests show that the use of ozone can provide an effective, rapid and simple means for killing micro-organisms in carious lesions.

EXAMPLE 4

Sealant Shear Bond Strength to Sound and Carious Radicular Dentine

These has been little research on the interaction between primary root carious lesions (PRCL) and adhesive materials. The aim of this study was to examine the shear bond strength of four adhesive systems to PRCL with sound dentine acting as a control. The adhesive systems used were:

1. OptiBond FL Prime¹/OptiBond FL Adhesive¹/OptiGuard¹

2. OptiBond FL Prime/OptiGuard

3. OptiGuard and

4. ChemFil II² ¹Kerr, Romulus, Mich., U.S.A.; ²Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany.

The materials were applied to sound radicular dentine and PRCL in vitro in freshly extracted teeth. The bonding site was macroscopically intact, was flat and had at least a 3.5 mm diameter. 37% phosphoric acid was used for 15 seconds in samples in groups 1->3 whilst 25% polyacrylic acid was used in group 4. After bonding the samples were stored for seven days in a moist atmosphere at 37° C. A shearing force was applied at 1 mm/minute. There were at least 10 samples in each group. The mean (s.e.) shear bond strengths were (MPa); Adhesive Control Carious OptiBond FL Prime/Optibond 5.31 (1.03) 5.58 (1.05) FL Adhesive/OptiGuard Optibond FL Prime/OptiGuard 2.01 (0.59) 1.63 (0.40) OptiGuard 0.73 (0.24) 1.45 (0.52) ChemFil II 1.42 (0.28) 1.01 (0.26)

While statistical testing showed that the shear bond strength of the OptiBond FL Prime/OptiBond FL Adhesive/OptiGuard was significantly the highest, (p<0.001), the caries status of the root surface had no significant influence on the bond strength. OptiGuard in combination with OptiBond FL Prime and OptiBond Adhesive had the highest bond strength and this was not influenced by the caries status of the surface.

EXAMPLE 5

The Effect of Ozone on Primary Root Caries and Associated Micro-Organisms

The aims of these studies were to evaluate the efficiency of ozone on primary root caries and associated micro-organisms (Streptococcus sobrinus; TH 21 Streptococcus mutans; NCTC 10449). In study 1, 40 soft primary root carious lesions (PRCLs) from freshly extracted teeth were used and randomly divided into two groups to test the exposure to ozone for either 10 or 20 seconds. There was a significant (p<0.001) difference (Mean±SE) between the control samples for either 10 seconds (log₁₀ 5.91±0.15) or 20 seconds (log₁₀ 6.18±0.21) and ozone treated samples for either 10 seconds (log₁₀ 3.57±0.37) or 20 seconds (log₁₀ 3.77±0.42). In study 2, 40 sterile saliva coated glass beads were put into bijoux bottles with 3 mls of Todd Hewitt broth for control and test groups. S. sobrinus and S. mutans were inoculated and incubated anaerobically overnight. Each glass bead was washed with 2 mls of PBS. Immediately, 10 seconds of ozone was applied to the glass beads in the test groups. Subsequently, each glass bead in the test and control groups was placed in 3 mls of Todd Hewitt broth with six more sterile glass beads and were vortexed for 30 seconds. After decimal dilutions, 100 ml aliquots were spread on blood agar plates supplemented with 5% (V/V) horse blood and placed in an anaerobic chamber at 37° C. for two days. The number of each colony type was counted and calculated. Using the paired student t-test, there was a significant reduction (p<0.0001) (Mean±SE) between the control samples for S. sobrinus (log₁₀ 4.61±0.13) and S. mutans (log₁₀ 3.93±0.07) and ozone treated samples for S. sobrinus (log₁₀ 1.09±0.36). This treatment regime is therefore an effective, quick, conservative and simple method to kill micro-organisms in primary root carious lesions.

EXAMPLE 6

The Effect of Ozone on Gum Disease.

Inflamed human gingivitis is exposed to ozone using the techniques herein described. After exposure to ozone, the inflammation is illuminated or reduced. In addition, enzyme levels in extracts from inflamed human gingiva are alleviated and/or reduced.

EXAMPLE 7

The Effect of Ozone on the Treatment of Root Canals.

Bacteria cultures of Streptococcus aurous, Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus acidophilus, known as being associated with dental diseases are exposed to ozone using the techniques herein described and growth of the bacteria cultures is eliminated or inhibited.

EXAMPLE 8

The Effect of Ozone in the Treatment of Month Ulcerations.

Month ulcerations are exposed to ozone using the techniques herein described and microorganisms in the ulceration are eliminated or reduced. In addition, enzyme levels in the month ulcerations are alleviated and/or reduced.

EXAMPLE 9

The Effect of Ozone in the Treatment of Bad Breath.

Bad breath is caused, in part, by the retention and subsequent degradation of dead cellular material, by microorganisms, sloughed off continuously by a normal, healthy mouth. A mouth is exposed to ozone using the techniques herein described and the microorganisms associated with bad breath are eliminated or reduced. In addition enzyme levels in the month are alleviated and/or reduced.

The present invention further relates to apparatus for the treatment of dental caries utilizing an oxidizing gas.

The role of specific micro-organism such as, for example, streptococcus mutants in dental caries is well documented. Enzymes produced by such micro-organisms synthesize dextran from the sucrose passing through the month with food or drink resulting in the formation of dental plaque and dental caries.

Dental caries is the decay of teeth caused by demineralization of the enamel surface with organic acids produced by bacteria which adhere to teeth surfaces.

Heretofore, dental caries have been removed through the use of conventional grinding handpieces, lasers and air-blasting apparatus. However high-speed turbine drills or low-speed drills unfortunately will grind both caries and sound dentine. Accordingly, a practitioner must select and grind only caries and consequently, this method depends upon this skill of the practitioner. Lasers have been utilized to remove caries, however, not much success has been achieved for varies reasons. For example, blackened charred tissue blocks the laser radiation which, in turn, prevents the laser from reaching caries therebelow. In addition, heating also interrupts the ablation process.

With regard to air-blasting treatment of caries sound, dentine may also be easily removed, and accordingly, the skill of the practitioner is of outmost importance.

The present invention provides for the treatment of caries without the disadvantages of the prior art hereinabove noted.

EXAMPLE 10 Ozone Detection (ppm) Around the Cup Using a Ozone Analyzer After Either 10 or 20 s of Ozone Application In Vivo

Study or Test: Ozone Detection (ppm) Around the Cup 34 Using a Ozone Analyzer after Either 10 or 20 s of Ozone Application In Vivo

Purpose: To assess the maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) around the cup 34 after either 10 s or 20 s of ozone application in vivo.

Study or Test Protocol: 20 primary root carious lesions (PRCLS) were randomly selected when the cross-sectional study was conducted. The tip of the sensor was always held within 2 mm of the edge of the cup, positioned half way between the mesial and occlusal sides of the cup. The maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) around the cup from the extracted teeth using an ozone analyzer after 10 s of ozone application. The ozone analyzer used was an API 450 model available from ENVIRO Technologies, UK, and was calibrated by the supplier within the previous week of delivery and this device was not used for any other purpose other than this study in the interim.

Overlying plaque was then removed using a hand held standard fine nylon fiber sterile toothbrush with water as a lubricant. Each tooth was dried using dry sterile cotton wool rolls and a dental 3 in 1-air syringe. The excavator blade was used to traverse the lesion in line with long axis of the tooth across the maximum gingival/occlusal dimension. Half of each lesion was removed using a sterile excavator. Subsequently, the remaining lesion was exposed to the ozone gas for a period of either 10 s or 20 s at room temperature (23° C.) and maximum detectable ozone level was also measured using this ozone analyzer.

Test Results:

The maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) around the cup from lesions for a period of either 10 s (Table 1 and FIG. 1) or 20 s (Table 2 and FIG. 2) ozone application during the treatment of root carious lesions were as follows: TABLE 1 Maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) after a 10 s of ozone application Ozone detection Teeth types Sites (10 s) Upper left incisor Mesial 0.066 Upper right 1. premolar Buccal 0.001 Upper right canine Distal 0.002 Upper right 1. molar Buccal 0.006 Upper left 2. premolar Buccal 0.076 Lower right 2. premolar Mesial 0.058 Lower left 1. premolar Buccal 0.169 Lower left lateral Buccal 0.106 Upper right lateral Distal 0.001 Lower left canine Labial 0.147

TABLE 2 Maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) after a 20 s of ozone application Ozone detection Teeth types Sites (20 s) Lower left lateral Labial 0.137 Lower left 1. premolar Buccal 0.177 Lower right incisor Labial 0.069 Upper right canine Labial 0.033 Upper right lateral Labial 0.079 Lower left 2. premolar Buccal 0.002 Lower right1. molar Buccal 0.083 Upper left lateral Labial 0.004 Lower left canine Labial 0.056 Upper left 1. premolar Mesial 0.001

Conclusion: The use of a cup is a safe way of delivering ozone when ozone was applied for a period of either 10 s or 20 s on the root carious lesions.

EXAMPLE 11 Assessment of Maximum Ozone Levels from Extracted Teeth after the Use of Ozone for 10 s.—An In Vitro Test Report

Study or Test: Assessment of the maximum detectable ozone levels, detected adjacent to the cup, from extracted teeth after the use of ozone for 10 s in vitro.

Purpose: To assess the maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) around a cup from the extracted teeth after a 10 s application of ozone.

Study or Test Protocol: 14 extracted teeth were selected. The tip of the sensor was always held within 2 mm of the edge of the cup, positioned half way between the mesial and occlusal sides of the cup. The maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) around the cup from the extracted teeth using an ozone analyzer was recorded during 10 s of ozone application with the generator setting on maximum at level 10. The ozone analyzer used was the API 450 model and this was calibrated by the supplier within the previous week of delivery. This device was not used for any other purpose other than this study in the interim.

The Ozone Delivery System

After plaque removal with 2 sterile cotton wool rolls, ozone gas was delivered onto the surface of each primary root carious lesion in each extracted tooth for 10 s after the lesion was dried for three seconds with a standard three in one dental syringe.

Test Results:

The maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) around the cup from the extracted teeth after a 10 s application of ozone during the treatment of root carious lesions were as shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 Maximum ozone detectable level (ppm) Teeth types Sites Ozone detection Upper incisor Mesial 0.005 Upper lateral incisor Labial 0.004 Upper canine Labial 0.003 Upper 1. premolar Mesial 0.006 Upper 2. premolar Distal 0.002 Upper 1. molar Buccal 0.003 Upper 2. molar Mesial 0 Lower incisor Lingual 0.007 Lower lateral incisor Distal 0.001 Lower canine Mesial 0 Lower 1. premolar Distal 0.009 Lower 2. premolar Lingual 0.018 Lower 1. molar Lingual 0.016 Lower 2. molar Mesial 0.005 Conclusion: The use of a cup is a safe way of delivering ozone when ozone was applied for a period of 10 s on the root carious lesions on extracted teeth.

EXAMPLE 12 Measurement of Ozone from the Handpiece

The handpiece 16 from the ozone generator 20 was attached directly to the inlet pipe a Mini-HiCon™ the ozone detector (not shown).

Peak readings from Mini-HiCon™ (g/Nm³) Duration Reading 1 Reading 2 Reading 3 Reading 4 Reading 5 Reading 6 Average (seconds) (g/Nm³) (g/Nm³) (g/Nm³) (g/Nm³) (g/Nm³) (g/Nm³) (g/Nm³) 5 5.4 5.3 5.4 4.3 5.2 5.2 5.1 10 4.7 4.8 4.6 3.5 4.4 4.5 4.4 20 4.9 5.9 6.3 6.3 5.9 30 6.3 6.5 6.3 6.6 6.4 60 6.6 7.0 7.0 6.7 6.8

Peak readings from Mini-HiCon™ (ppm) Duration Reading 1 Reading 2 Reading 3 Reading 4 Reading 5 Reading 6 Average (seconds) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 5 2522 2475 2522 2008 2428 2428 2397 10 2195 2242 2148 1635 2055 2102 2063 20 2288 2755 2942 2942 2732 30 2942 3036 2942 3082 3000 60 3082 3269 3269 3129 3187 The peak reading was obtained after about 8 seconds (even when the generator was switched on for only 5 seconds) and perhaps represented an “overshoot” before the generator/detector combination stabilized for the >20 second durations. The level then remained fairly constant at between 3.6 and 4.7 g/Nm³. To Convert from g/m³ to ppm: The formula weight of ozone is 48 g and therefore 1 g of ozone is 1/48th of a mole. The molar volume of an ideal gas (at standard temperature and pressure) is 0.0224138 m³/mol. 0.0224138/48=467×10⁻⁶ m³. Therefore 1 g/m³ of ozone in air is 467 ppm. (The ozone detector gives readings as g/Nm³ which is “normalized” to standard temperature and pressure). Measurement of the Ozone Dissolving in a Potassium Iodide Solution

Ozone was passed through the handpiece 16, immersed in 100 ml of a 20 mM potassium iodide solution in a 250 ml conical flask covered with parafilm for the stated durations. The handpiece was then removed and the flask sealed with a neoprene bung and shaken vigorously. A 1.50 ml aliquot was removed and its electronic absorption spectrum acquired. (These measurements were taken before a diffuser was fitted.) The generator settings were:—air=1, O₃=1, vac=0, red=0, regulator-setting=10. λ_(max) λ_(max) λ_(max) λ_(max) (351 nm) Duration (351 nm) (351 nm) (351 nm) average (seconds) absorbance absorbance absorbance absorbance 1 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.08 2 0.50 0.44 0.26 0.40 3 0.70 0.56 0.42 0.56 4 0.77 0.69 0.50 0.65 5 0.90 0.84 0.51 0.75 6 1.08 0.99 0.68 0.92 7 1.17 1.11 0.75 1.01 8 1.30 1.27 0.95 1.17 9 1.40 1.40 1.19 1.33 10  1.57 1.43 1.38 1.46

To calculate the concentration from the peak absorbance: A = E × C × L where L = cell path length (1 cm) C = concentration (mol) E = extinction coefficient A = absorbance E for 1 M = 2.97 × 10⁴ E for 1 μM = 0.0297 C = A ÷ E

concentration in μmol/l is absorbance/0.0297

Total Volume of λ_(max) dissolved air/ozone Ozone Ozone Duration absorbance Concentration ozone Ozone mixture in air in air (seconds) (average of 3) (μmol/l) (μmol) (μg) (ml) (μg/ml = g/m³) (ppm) 1 0.08 2.69 0.269 13 8 1.625 759 2 0.40 13.47 1.347 65 16 4.063 1897 3 0.50 18.86 1.886 91 24 3.792 1771 4 0.65 21.89 2.189 105 32 3.281 1532 5 0.75 25.25 2.525 121 40 3.025 1413 6 0.92 30.98 3.098 149 48 3.104 1450 7 1.01 34.39 3.439 165 56 2.946 1376 8 1.17 39.39 3.939 189 64 2.953 1379 9 1.33 44.79 4.479 215 72 2.986 1394 10 1.46 49.16 4.916 236 80 2.950 1378 NMR Analysis of Plaque/Caries

-   1. Plaque samples were obtained from volunteers and each sample was     divided into two. Half of each sample was treated with ozone and     half left untreated as a control. -   2. The samples were each weighed. Then 600 μl of 0.5 M HClO₄ was     added to each sample and rotamixed. -   3. The samples were centrifuged and supernatants retained. -   4. The samples were neutralized to a pH of between 6 and 8 and the     volume of KOH used was noted. -   5. The samples were centrifuged again and 600 μl of supernatant were     taken for analysis. -   6. 70 μl of D₂O and 30 μl of sodium     3-trimethylsilyl-(2,2,3,3,-²H₄)-propionate

(5 mM in D₂O) were added prior to NMR analysis.

NMR Analysis of Saliva

-   1. Saliva samples were obtained from volunteers and each sample was     divided into two. Half of each sample was treated with ozone and     half left untreated as a control. -   2. The samples were centrifuged and supernatants retained. -   3. 70 μl of D₂O and 30 μl of sodium     3-trimethylsilyl-(2,2,3,3,-²H₄)-propionate

(5 mM in D₂O) were added prior to NMR analysis.

Iodine Standards (in 20 mM Potassium Iodide) Iodine Concentration Absorbance at 351 nm 4 uM 0.1144 5 uM 0.1410 7 uM 0.1690 10 uM  0.2002

Although there has been hereinabove described a specific method apparatus for the treatment of dental and oral conditions, specifically root canals, in accordance with the present invention for the purpose of illustrating the manner in which the invention may be used to advantage, it should be appreciated that the invention is not limited thereto. That is, the present invention may suitably comprise, consist of, or consist essentially of the recited elements. Further, the invention illustratively disclosed herein suitably may be practiced in the absence of any element which is not specifically disclosed herein. Accordingly, any and all modifications, variations or equivalent arrangements which may occur to those skilled in the art, should be considered to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims. 

1. A method of treating root canals, said method comprising: directing an oxidizing gas onto an open root canal through a needle; maintain a presence of the oxidizing gas onto the root canal for a period of time sufficient to kill microorganisms therein; and preventing escape of the oxidizing gas from the root canal.
 2. The method according to claim 1 further comprising flushing the oxidizing gas from the root canal with a reductant.
 3. Apparatus for a treatment of root canals, said apparatus comprising: a source of oxidizing gas; a handpiece; a needle extending from said handpiece and receivable in a tooth root canal, said needle including an oxidizing gas delivery lumen therethrough; and a cup attached to said handpiece and surrounding said needle.
 4. The apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said oxidizing gas comprises ozone.
 5. The apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said needle is flexible.
 6. The apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said cup includes a resistant edge engagable with a cusp area of the tooth.
 7. The apparatus according to claim 3 wherein said source of oxidizing gas includes an ozone pump and further comprises an aspiration pump and an aspiration line connected to said handpiece and circulating the gas through the needle lumen and out of a cup chamber subtending a cup edge.
 8. The apparatus according to claim 7 wherein said aspiration line is separate from said needle line.
 9. The apparatus according to claim 7 further comprises an ozone and aspiration pump controller to circulate the gas through the needle lumen and out of the cup chamber at a pressure insufficient to escape past a sealed engagement between the cup and the tooth.
 10. Apparatus for the treatment of root canals, said apparatus comprising: a source of oxidizing gas; a handpiece; a needle extending from said handpiece and receivable in a tooth root canal, said needle including an oxidizing gas delivery lumen therethrough; a cup attached to said handpiece and surrounding said needle; and a source of reductant interconnected with said handpiece in order to flush the gas from said cup.
 11. The apparatus according to claim 10 wherein said oxidizing gas comprises ozone.
 12. The apparatus according to claim 10 wherein said needle is flexible.
 13. The apparatus according to claim 10 wherein said cup includes a resistant edge engagable with a cusp area of the tooth.
 14. The apparatus according to claim 10 wherein said source of oxidizing gas includes an ozone pump and further comprises an aspiration pump and an aspiration line connecting to said handpiece and circulating the gas through the needle lumen and out of a cusp chamber subtending a cup edge.
 15. The apparatus according to claim 14 wherein said aspiration line is separate from said needle line.
 16. The apparatus according to claim 14 further comprises an ozone and aspiration pump controller to circulate the gas through the needle lumen and out of the cup chamber a pressure insufficient to escape past a sealed engagement between the cup and the tooth.
 17. The apparatus according to claim 14 further comprising a reductant pump for circulating the reductant through the needle line and cup to flush the oxidizing gas from the cup and into said aspiration line.
 18. The apparatus according to claim 14 further comprising a waste reductant accumulator connected to said aspiration line.
 19. The apparatus according to claim 19 further comprises a residual oxidizing gas aspiration line filter. 